Ebook File Check

Validate an EPUB from a public URL or chat attachment against the EPUB 2/3 specification using EPUBCheck, with exact rule IDs and file locations, or compare two builds. A pass does not guarantee accessibility, visual rendering, distributor acceptance, or editorial quality.

该来源不提供完整文件导出（国内平台多为平台内托管），仅存元数据与原链

接入信息

传输形态: http
鉴权方式: 鉴权未知
端点: https://epub-check--powmcp.run.tools

鉴权方式未标注，请核对官方文档后再接入——不要直接使用以下片段

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "Ebook File Check": {
      "url": "https://epub-check--powmcp.run.tools"
    }
  }
}

能力清单

工具

说明

ebook_check

Validates one EPUB (a directly hosted public URL or a file attached in chat) against the EPUB 2/3 specification using a pinned local EPUBCheck 5.3.0 engine run in a no-network sandbox. Each call takes exactly one source: the url parameter or the file attachment, never both. Returns the automated verdict: pass boolean, EPUB version, message counts by severity (fatal/error/warning/usage), findings grouped most-severe-first with EPUBCheck rule id (RSC-005, OPF-014, …), file path and line/column, plus a structural inventory (spine items, media types, remote-resource state), SHA-256 of the exact bytes, and truncation metadata. Use for one-file readiness and diagnosis: 'is this ebook valid', 'does this EPUB have specification problems before upload', 'what is wrong with it'. A pass means only that the bytes satisfied the automated profile; it never renders the book, judges accessibility, or guarantees any store will accept it, and human review of how the book reads and looks is always required. Downloads and validates a live EPUB in about five to seven seconds, hard-bounded at the 110-second call deadline.

ebook_compare

Runs the identical pinned EPUBCheck 5.3.0 validation over exactly two EPUB builds (directly hosted public URLs or files attached in chat, baseline first, revised second) sequentially under one shared 110-second deadline, then reports which spec findings regressed or were fixed between them. Returns per-build hashes, EPUB versions, pass verdicts and severity counts, a regressions list (rules that appear or worsen in the revised build) and a fixed list (rules removed or reduced), and a ranking by pass state then fewer blocking findings. Use for 'did my re-export get worse', 'which build has fewer problems', and revision-over-revision questions. The ranking orders automated conformance only (it never means one build renders, reads, or sells better), and when both builds tie on pass state and blocking count it names no winner rather than crowning the first submission. It also flags when the two files declare different titles, since that usually means they are not two builds of one book. Human review remains required for both builds. A comparison measures about ten to fifteen seconds, hard-bounded at the shared 110-second deadline.

纠错与举报（发现条目失效、署名有误或涉及侵权？）

提交举报 / 纠错

侵权举报经核验成立后，我们会即时下线该条目并删除已存的内容副本。