vera-eb1-judging

Use when user needs to argue EB-1 Criterion 4 (judging the work of others — peer review, editorial board, grant panels, competition judging) for EB-1A or EB-1B. Triggers include: 'judging criterion', 'peer review criterion', 'journal reviewer argument', 'editorial board', 'grant panel', 'conference program committee', 'competition judge', 'document my reviewer activity', 'my Publons profile', or when the user wants to argue their judging activities meet Criterion 4. Handles 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(iv) (EB-1A) and EB-1B equivalent. Applies the Score 3/2/1 tier framework (editorial board + grant panel = 3; documented multi-journal peer review = 2; ad-hoc reviews = 1). Warns that peer review alone is "routine" per AAO and rarely survives Step 2 without other evidence. Do NOT use for arguing the petitioner's OWN work was reviewed favorably — that is Criterion 3 (published material about) or Criterion 6 (authorship). Criterion 4 = petitioner judging others.

存档时间线

版本索引永久保留；内容副本只保留最新 1 份，更早版本仅留索引与哈希（存档时间线的证据链不会因此断裂）。

下载存档内容副本