Prompt Quality Score - PQS

PQS is the fastest way to get better output from any AI model. Score any prompt before it hits the model. Get a grade (A-F), score out of 80, percentile, and dimension breakdown across 8 quality dimensions. Built on PEEM, RAGAS, MT-Bench, G-Eval, and ROUGE frameworks. Pre-flight, not post-hoc. The AI input quality problem is real. PQS solves it. MCP Tools: - score_prompt: Free. Returns grade (A-F), score out of 80, percentile, and full 8-dimension breakdown. No API key needed. - optimize_prompt: $0.025 USDC. Returns a rewritten, higher-scoring version of your prompt with before/after dimension deltas. HTTP API (x402-native on Base): - /api/score/free: Free. Grade, percentile, and 8-dimension breakdown. No payment required. - /api/score: $0.025 USDC. Single score, pay-per-call. - /api/score/full: $0.125 USDC. Grade, percentile, dimension breakdown, and rewrite. - /api/score/batch: $0.25 USDC. Score multiple prompts in a single call. - /api/preflight: $0.05 USDC. Lightweight pre-flight quality check. Paste a prompt. Get an optimized version. Ship better work. Cheaper than one bad prompt. https://promptqualityscore.com

该来源不提供完整文件导出（国内平台多为平台内托管），仅存元数据与原链

模型生成摘要（rules/v1 · 2026-09-27 16:41）：PQS is the fastest way to get better output from any AI model
这是模型对公开材料的总结，不是官方声明，请以原链内容为准。

接入信息

传输形态: http
鉴权方式: 鉴权未知
端点: https://pqs--onchaintel.run.tools

鉴权方式未标注，请核对官方文档后再接入——不要直接使用以下片段

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "Prompt Quality Score - PQS": {
      "url": "https://pqs--onchaintel.run.tools"
    }
  }
}

能力清单

工具

说明

score_prompt

Score a prompt's quality across 8 dimensions BEFORE sending it to an expensive model. Returns a 0-80 score, an A-F grade, the per-dimension breakdown (clarity, specificity, context, constraints, output_format, role_definition, examples, cot_structure), and the weakest dimension. USE WHEN: - The user is workshopping a prompt and asks "is this good?" / "will this work?" / "should I add more detail?" - The user is about to send a long or expensive prompt to GPT-4, Claude Opus, or any frontier model, especially in a batch or automation context where rework is costly. - The user mentions iterating on a prompt that produced poor output and wants to diagnose what's missing. - The user pastes a prompt and asks for feedback on it. DO NOT USE WHEN: - The user is asking you to write a prompt for them (write it yourself first, then optionally call score_prompt to verify). - The prompt is conversational chat (this scores task-shaped prompts). COST: Free, no API key required. Rate-limited per IP: 5/min, 10/day, 100/month. If the user exceeds the limit, the response will include a structured upgrade path with subscribe and account URLs. LATENCY: ~2 seconds.

optimize_prompt

Rewrite a prompt to score higher on the PQS rubric, AND show before/after output comparisons so the user can see the impact. Returns the optimized prompt, the original PQS score, the optimized PQS score, and side-by-side sample outputs from a frontier model using both versions. USE WHEN: - The user got a low score from score_prompt and asks how to improve. - The user explicitly asks to "improve" / "rewrite" / "fix" / "optimize" a prompt they pasted. - The user is dissatisfied with output quality from a previous prompt and asks how to get better results. - score_prompt returned a suggestion to invoke this tool. DO NOT USE WHEN: - The user just asked for a score (use score_prompt only — don't double up). - The user wants you to write a new prompt from scratch (write it directly). REQUIRES: A PQS API key from a Pro subscription ($19.99/month, 1,000 calls/mo, includes batch + A/B comparison). If the user has not provided one, the tool returns a clear subscription URL — pass that response to the user verbatim. Do not invent or guess API keys. There is no free trial of this tool; the user must subscribe before the first call. COST: Counted against your Pro subscription's monthly call quota. LATENCY: ~6-8 seconds.

纠错与举报（发现条目失效、署名有误或涉及侵权？）

提交举报 / 纠错

侵权举报经核验成立后，我们会即时下线该条目并删除已存的内容副本。