目录 / Roundtable
MCP
鉴权未知
未评级
已上架
Roundtable
Your AI Board of Directors. Run multi-model debates where GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, and more discuss your question, then a moderator synthesizes their perspectives into actionable insight.
该来源不提供完整文件导出(国内平台多为平台内托管),仅存元数据与原链
接入信息
- 传输形态
- http
- 鉴权方式
- 鉴权未知
- 端点
https://roundtable--roundtable.run.tools
鉴权方式未标注,请核对官方文档后再接入——不要直接使用以下片段
{
"mcpServers": {
"Roundtable": {
"url": "https://roundtable--roundtable.run.tools"
}
}
}
能力清单
| 工具 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| list-models | List available AI models grouped by thinking level (low/medium/high). Shows default models, credit costs, capabilities for each tier. Use this before consult to understand model options. |
| list-sessions | List your previous MCP tool sessions. Returns session metadata including prompt, tool used, quality score, and credits consumed. Useful for reviewing past council discussions. |
| get-session | Get full details of a previous MCP session by ID. Returns the complete result including participant responses and moderator synthesis. Use list-sessions first to find session IDs. |
| get-logs | Query structured logs from your MCP tool executions. Filter by session, severity level, event type, and time range. Useful for debugging and monitoring tool usage. |
| check-usage | Check your remaining credits, usage limits, and plan info |
| get-thread-link | Get the dashboard URL for a previous debate session. Returns the thread link and public URL if the thread is public. |
| set-thread-visibility | Set a thread as public or private. Public threads can be shared via URL. Use session_id from a previous debate session. |
| consult-council | Consult the AI coding council — multiple models discuss your engineering question sequentially (each sees prior responses), then a moderator synthesizes. Auto-mode by default — AI picks optimal models, roles, and conversation mode from your prompt. Provide explicit models to override (manual mode). Fully configurable: mode, format, roles, models, thinking level. |
| design-architecture | Architecture design council. Systems Architect, Infrastructure Engineer, and DX Advocate evaluate your system design. Always uses high thinking for maximum depth. Output as ADR. |
| review-code | Code review council. Senior Engineer, Security Reviewer, and Performance Analyst analyze your code and a moderator synthesizes their findings. |
| plan-implementation | Implementation planning council. Tech Lead, Senior Engineer, and QA Strategist break down a feature into actionable steps, identify risks, and define acceptance criteria. Output as ADR. |
| debug-issue | Debugging council. Root Cause Analyst, Systems Engineer, and Edge Case Investigator collaboratively diagnose bugs, analyze errors, and propose fixes. |
| assess-tradeoffs | Tradeoff assessment council. Pragmatist, Skeptic, and Futurist evaluate options from different angles — short-term vs long-term, risk vs reward, simplicity vs flexibility. Output as pros-cons. |
纠错与举报(发现条目失效、署名有误或涉及侵权?)
提交举报 / 纠错
侵权举报经核验成立后,我们会即时下线该条目并删除已存的内容副本。