目录 / noisefloor
MCP
鉴权未知
未评级
已上架
noisefloor
Is this number real, or is it noise? Peek-safe A/B tests you can look at as often as you like, two-sided change detection, honest forecasts with a scored record, and a guard for metrics that only moved because their sample size did. Zero dependencies.
该来源不提供完整文件导出(国内平台多为平台内托管),仅存元数据与原链
接入信息
- 传输形态
- http
- 鉴权方式
- 鉴权未知
- 端点
https://noisefloor--mrinallovesbhature.run.tools
鉴权方式未标注,请核对官方文档后再接入——不要直接使用以下片段
{
"mcpServers": {
"noisefloor": {
"url": "https://noisefloor--mrinallovesbhature.run.tools"
}
}
}
能力清单
| 工具 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| ab_test | Can you call a winner on an A/B test yet? Uses anytime-valid confidence sequences, so it is SAFE TO RUN AFTER EVERY OBSERVATION — peeking does not inflate the false-positive rate the way a t-test or z-test does. |
| did_it_change | Did a metric actually change, or is the move noise? Detects both rises AND collapses against the metric's own history, with a stated false-alarm rate and no assumption about the distribution. |
| forecast_next | What should the next reading be, and within what range? Range adapts to the metric's recent volatility and stays valid even when the metric shifts. |
| real_or_sampling | Did the metric move, or did the sample size underneath it move? Run this before reporting any RATE as a change — conversion rates, error rates and click-through all shift when the denominator shifts, for reasons that have nothing to do with the thing being measured. |
| score_forecasts | How good would these forecasts actually have been? Grades every prediction the tool would have made over the history, using only what was known at the time, and reports calibration plus the worst misses. |
| which_metrics_matter | You watch many metrics; which genuinely stand out? Controls the false discovery rate across all of them at once, which per-metric thresholds do not: forty metrics each alerting wrongly 5% of the time means two false alarms every round. |
纠错与举报(发现条目失效、署名有误或涉及侵权?)
提交举报 / 纠错
侵权举报经核验成立后,我们会即时下线该条目并删除已存的内容副本。