fast-fact-check

Fast, source-backed answer to a factual question — a technology, a term/noun, a date/version/value, or a "is it true that…" claim. Triage the question simple vs complex, fan out PARALLEL web searches, early-exit the moment the answer is corroborated, and return a citation-backed bottom-line answer within a hard time budget: simple ≤2 min, complex ≤5 min. Speed/efficiency is the defining goal. Use when the user wants a quick verified answer: "fact-check this", "quickly find out / look up X", "what is <tech/term>", "is it true that Y", "$fact-check". Do NOT use for: a thorough, exhaustive, multi-source RESEARCH REPORT (that is deep-research — this skill returns a bounded BLUF answer, not a report); subjective / opinion / recommendation questions with no factual answer ("best laptop for me"); domain deep-evaluations with their own skill (album-review for 乐评, hifi-review for audio gear); questions answerable from the open repo/context with no web lookup; creative, math, or coding tasks with no external fact to verify.

模型生成摘要（rules/v1 · 2026-09-21 15:27）：Fast, source-backed answer to a factual question — a technology, a term/noun, a date/version/value, or a "is it true tha…
这是模型对公开材料的总结，不是官方声明，请以原链内容为准。

存档时间线

版本	存档时间	内容哈希	内容
v1	2026-09-21 15:26	e952cd03	可取

版本索引永久保留；内容副本只保留最近 2 版，更早版本仅留索引与哈希（存档时间线的证据链不会因此断裂）。

下载存档内容副本

纠错与举报（发现条目失效、署名有误或涉及侵权？）

提交举报 / 纠错

侵权举报经核验成立后，我们会即时下线该条目并删除已存的内容副本。